Combining 2D and 3D Fundamentals to Foster Systems Thinking in Design Students: Reflections and Case Studies from an Interdisciplinary Design Degree
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53450/2179-1465.RG.2022v13i3p44-57Keywords:
Design Education, Interdisciplinary, Synergy, Systems Thinking, Transition DesignAbstract
This paper proposes some interdisciplinary design education approaches which can help to introduce students to more holistic perspectives of design practice, the world, and the influence of design within it. Through reflection on our design education practice, the authors highlight particular benefits of integrative design pedagogy to increase student awareness of relationships between disciplines, systems thinking, ability to design for ‘synergy’, and to more adequately prepare designers for an increasingly interconnected and changing world. Case study as a qualitative methodology is utilised to reflect on our interdisciplinary design studio educational practice (Baskarada, 2014; Rashid et al., 2019). Reflective practice methodology is also used to critically reflect on the design education case studies (Brookfield, 2000; Osterman, 1990). Key findings from these case studies suggest that teaching both 2D and 3D design fundamentals in combination, and having real world projects, can give students more awareness of the interrelatedness of design disciplines and foster systems thinking from early in their design studies/careers. Non-assessed collaboration between students from different programmes also needs to be encouraged and facilitated. Introducing critical reflective approaches are also important, to give learners deeper understandings of the implications of design and the importance of designing to counteract ‘wicked problems’.
Downloads
References
Anand, G., Larson, E. C., & Mahoney, J. T. (2020). Thomas Kuhn on paradigms. Production and Operations Management, 29(7), 1650-1657.
Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Baškarada, S.(2014). Qualitative case studies guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1-25.
Boddington, A., Kermik, J., & Ainsworth, T. (2016). Interdisciplinary Design in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Brighton. In Creating Innovation Leaders (pp. 239-254). Springer, Cham.
Boradkar, P. (2017). Taming wickedness by interdisciplinary design. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 456-467.
Boylston, S. (2019). Designing with society: a capabilities approach to design, systems thinking and social innovation. Routledge.
Brookfield, S. D. (2000). The concept of critically reflective practice. Handbook of adult and continuing education, 2, 33-49.
Bryant, M. (2021). Learning Spatial Design through Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Land, 10(7), 689.
Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). About transition design. Transition Design Seminar CMU. Retrieved May 17, 2022, from https://transitiondesignseminarcmu.net/
Cotantino, T., Kellam, N., Cramond, B., & Crowder, I. (2010). An interdisciplinary design studio: How can art and engineering collaborate to increase students’ creativity?. Art Education, 63(2), 49-53.
DeKay, M. (1996, April). Systems thinking as the basis for an ecological design education. In Proceedings of the National Passive Solar Conference (Vol. 21, pp. 366-373). AMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY INC.
Eastern Institute of Technology. (2021, August 31). Bachelor of creative practice: Visual arts and design: Eit Hawke's bay and Tairāwhiti. EIT Hawke's Bay and Tairāwhiti | The experience you need and the support to succeed. Retrieved May 18, 2022, from https://www.eit.ac.nz/programmes/bachelor-of-creative-practice/
Fry, T. (1999). A new design philosophy: an introduction to defuturing. UNSW Press.
Furniss, L. (2022). Post-Disciplinary Design: Metadesigning as the Reinvention of Designing Within Education. In Metadesigning Designing in the Anthropocene (pp. 160-170). Routledge.
Gerber, A. (1991). Synergy, Holistic Education and R. Buckminster Fuller: Education for a World in Transformation.
Hohl, M. (2015). Living in cybernetics: Polynesian voyaging and ecological literacy as models for design education. Kybernetes.
Irwin, T., Tonkinwise, C., & Kossoff, G. (2022). Transition design: An educational framework for advancing the study and design of sustainable transitions. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos, (105), 31-72.
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229-246.
Kang, N. (2008). Activation plan for the convergence study of scientific technology & humanities and social sciences. Sejong City: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Klein, J., & Newell, W. (1998). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In W. Newell (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. The structure of scientific theories, 2, 459-482.
Lattuca, L., Knight, D., & Bergom, I. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 726–739.
McDonald, J. K., West, R. E., Rich, P. J., & Pfleger, I. (2019). “It’s so wonderful having different majors working together”: The development of an interdisciplinary design thinking minor. TechTrends, 63(4), 440-450.
Metadesign-introduction. Metadesigners Network 2022. (n.d.). Retrieved May 17, 2022, from https://metadesigners.org/Metadesign-Introduction
Moirano, R., Sánchez, M. A., & Štěpánek, L. (2020). Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100626.
Monat, J. P., & Gannon, T. F. (2015). What is systems thinking? A review of selected literature plus recommendations. American Journal of Systems Science, 4(1), 11-26.
Nousala, S., Ing, D., & Jones, P. H. (2018). Systemic design agendas in education and design research. FormAkademisk-forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk, 11(4).
Norman, D., & Klemmer, S. (2014). State of design: How design education must change. Linkedin. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140325102438-12181762-state-of-design-how-design-education-must-change. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
Osterman, K. F. (1990). Reflective practice: A new agenda for education. Education and urban society, 22(2), 133-152.
Paradigm-glossary. Metadesigners Network 2022. (n.d.). Retrieved May 18, 2022, from https://metadesigners.org/Paradigm-Glossary
Park, H., & Benson, E. (2013). Systems thinking and connecting the silos of design education. In DS 76: Proceedings of E&PDE 2013, the 15th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Dublin, Ireland, 05-06.09. 2013.
Perna, S., Nunziante, P., Chew, J. Y., Vela, S. D. F., Guzman-Abello, L., & Rodríguez, S. P. (2021). Track 05: Co-creation of Interdisciplinary Design Educations.
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 1609406919862424.
Repko, A. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (2nd ed.). New York: SAGE Publications Inc.
Rodgers, P. A., & Bremner, C. (2017). The concept of the design discipline. Dialectic, 1(1).
Scharoun, L., & Montana-Hoyos, C. A. (2016). Industrial and graphic design in the'Innovation Nation': the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and exchange in design education. In Proceedings of the 2016 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Conference (pp. 1-12). Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools.
Self, J. A., Evans, M., Jun, T., & Southee, D. (2019). Interdisciplinary: challenges and opportunities for design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 843-876.
Self, J. A., & Baek, J. S. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in design education: Understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(3), 459–480.
Synergy-Glossary. Metadesigners Network 2022. (n.d.). Retrieved May 18, 2022, from http://metadesigners.org/Synergy-Glossary
Wood, J. (2021). Art school futures. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 14(1), 13-26.
Wood, J. (2017), "From Products to Relations: Adding jeong to the metadesigner’s vocabulary", for A Handbook of Sustainable Product Design by Jonathan Chapman, Routledge, ISBN-10: 1138910171, ISBN-13: 978-1138910171
Wood, J. (2013). Meta-designing for paradigm change: An ecomimetic, language-centred approach. The handbook of design for sustainability, 428-445.
Wood, John. 2007. 'Dancing with Disorder: Synergizing Synergies within Metadesign'. In: Conference 'Dancing with Disorder'. Izmir, Turkey 11-13 April, 2007. [Conference or Workshop Item]
Yadav, M. (2021). Reinventing Design Education for Twenty-First Century. In Design for Tomorrow—Volume 2 (pp. 361-370). Springer, Singapore.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 James Smith-Harvey, Mazin Bahho, Roger Kelly, Anthony Chiappin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, to publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
