Stepping out of the Ivory Tower: practice-led inquiry and postdisciplinary research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53450/2179-1465.RG.2022v13i2p5-16Keywords:
Design, postdisciplinarity, practice-led research, thesis supervision, university structuresAbstract
This article considers the nature of postdisciplinary research as it relates to certain practice-led design inquiries. From a discussion of discipline territoriality in the academy, it moves to a consideration of how historical demarcations were disrupted and reshaped by professional disciplines that entered universities in the latter part of the 20th century. Among these, areas like design, with its high levels of situated experimentation, reflection on practice and applied professional knowing, began to challenge established disciplinary conventions. Building on the proposition that certain practice-led inquiries in design are postdisciplinary in nature, the article considers three examples of recent doctoral theses. In discussing these projects, it reveals ways in which knowledge from within and beyond conventionally demarcated disciplinary fields was gathered, interpreted and creatively synthesised. In concluding, the article proposes that practice-led, postdisciplinary research may usefully contribute to the ongoing need for expansive, flexible and appreciative approaches to knowledge generation.
Downloads
References
Anthony, T., & Sherwood, J. (2018). Postdisciplinary responses to positivism’s punitiveness. Journal of Global Indigeneity, 3(1). Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/jgi/vol3/iss1/3
Blagg, H., & Anthony, T. (2019). Decolonising criminology: imagining justice in a postcolonial World. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Connors, R. J. (1998). The rhetoric of citation systems—Part I: The development of annotation structures from the renaissance to 1900. Rhetoric Review, 17(1), 6-48, doi: 10.1080/07350199809359230
Connors, R. J. (1999). The rhetoric of citation systems—Part II: Competing epistemic values in citation. Rhetoric Review, 17(2), 219-245, doi: 10.1080/07350199909359242
Darbellay, F. (2016). From disciplinarity to postdisciplinarity: Tourism studies dedisciplined. Tourism Analysis, 21(4), 363-372. doi:10.3727/108354216X14600320851659
Grafton, A. (1997). The footnote: A curious history. Harvard University Press, pp. 27-31.
Gusdorf, G. (1983). Passé, présent, avenir de la recherche interdisciplinaire. In L. Apostel, J. M. Benoist, T. B. Bottomore, K. E. Boulding, M. Dufrenne, M. Eliade, C. Furtado, G. Gusdorf, D. Krishna, W. J. Mommsen, E. Morin, M. Piattelli-Palmarini, M. A. Sinacoeur, S. N. Smirnov, & J. Ui (Eds.), Interdisciplinarite et sciences humaines (pp. 31-51). UNESCO.
Hearn A. (2003). Interdisciplinarity / extradisciplinarity: On the university and the active pursuit of community. History of Intellectual Culture, 3(1), 1-13.
Hollinshead, K. (2016). Postdisciplinarity and the rise of intellectual openness: The necessity for “plural knowability” in Tourism Studies. Tourism Analysis, 21(4), 349–361. doi:10.3727/108354216X14600320851613
Klein, J. T. (2000). A conceptual vocabulary of interdisciplinary science. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising Interdisciplinarity, (pp. 3-24). University of Toronto Press.
Kleining, G., & Witt, H. (2000). The qualitative heuristic approach: A methodology for discovery in psychology and the social sciences. Rediscovering the method of introspection as an example. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/1123
McElreavy, C., Tobin, V., Martin, T., Bea Damon, M., Crate, N., Godinez, A., & Bennett, K. (2016). The history of the academy and the disciplines. Retrieved from https://press.rebus.community/idsconnect/chapter/the-history-of-the-academy-and-the-disciplines/
Moustakas, C. E. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology and applications. Sage Publications.
Pernecky, T., Munar, A. M., & Feighery, W. (2016). Tourism in a postdisciplinary milieu: Final demarcation points. Tourism Analysis, 21(4), 431–434. doi:10.3727/108354216X14600320851857
Pernecky, T. (2019). Postdisciplinary knowledge. Routledge. https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.4324/9780429058561
Post, R. (2009). Debating disciplinarity. Critical Inquiry, 35(4), 749-770.
Rossi-Linnemann, C., & de Martini, G. (2021). Art in science museums: Towards a post-disciplinary approach. Routledge.
Sayer, A. (2003). Long live postdisciplinary studies! Sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism/imperialism. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/sayer-long-live-postdisciplinary-studies.pdf
Sheehan, M. (2020). The sound of identity – Interpreting the multi-dimensionality of wāhine Māori through audio portraiture [Doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology]. Tuwhera. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13262
Steagall, M., & Ings, W. (2018). Practice-led doctoral research and the nature of immersive methods. Journal of Art, Design and Technology [DAT], 3(2), 392-423.
Tavares, T. (2019). Magical realities: A creative consideration of the narrative and illustrative potentials of realism maravilhoso [Doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology]. Tuwhera. https://designassembly.org.nz/2018/10/01/postgraduate-design-research-tatiana-tavares-aut/
Ventling, F. D. (2018). Heuristics. A framework to clarify practice led research. Journal of Art, Design and Technology [DAT], 3(2), 122-156.
Wood, J. (2004). The culture of academic rigour: Does design research really need it? The Design Journal, 3(1), 44-57.
Wright, J. T., Embrick, D. G., & Henke, K. (2015). Interdisciplinarity, postdisciplinarity, and anomic specialization: Where do we locate sociology? Humanity & Society, 39(3), 267-273.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Welby Ings; Marcos Mortensen Steagall
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, to publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
